Knowledge Center · Water

Data Center Water Usage: How Much, Why, and How It Compares to Golf Courses

Data center water use has become a local flashpoint, and the comparison with golf courses shows up in nearly every debate. Here are the best available U.S. figures, with the year and scope of each, why data centers use water at all, how designs reduce it, and what the golf comparison can and cannot tell you.

11 min read All levels Updated October 2026

Short answer: U.S. data center water usage was about 66 billion liters (about 17 billion gallons) of direct consumption in 2023, mostly for cooling, according to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. U.S. golf facilities applied a projected 1.63 million acre-feet (about 531 billion gallons) in 2024, according to the GCSAA. Golf's total is larger, but the two figures measure different things.

Key takeaways

  • Direct (on-site) data center water consumption was about 66 billion liters in 2023, roughly three times the 2014 level, with hyperscale and colocation sites accounting for 84 percent.
  • Water consumed indirectly to generate data centers' electricity was nearly 800 billion liters in 2023, far more than direct use.
  • U.S. golf facilities applied a projected 1.63 million acre-feet of water in 2024, 31 percent less than in 2005.
  • The golf comparison mixes consumption with application, direct with indirect, and national totals with local impact. Treat it as context, not a verdict.
  • Cooling design trades water against energy: waterless systems use more electricity, which carries its own indirect water footprint.

How much water do data centers use?

U.S. data centers directly consumed about 66 billion liters of water in 2023, according to the 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage Report from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy. That is on-site consumption, mostly from cooling. The same report estimates nearly 800 billion liters of indirect consumption at the power plants that generated the facilities' electricity.

~66 billion L
Direct U.S. data center water consumption, 2023 (about 17 billion gallons)
Source: LBNL, 2024
~800 billion L
Indirect consumption through electricity generation, 2023 (about 211 billion gallons)
Source: LBNL, 2024
1.63 million acre-feet
Water applied on U.S. golf facilities, 2024 (about 531 billion gallons)
Source: GCSAA, 2025
U.S. data center water figures from the LBNL 2024 report
MeasureFigureYearScope
Direct water consumption21.2 billion liters2014All U.S. data centers, on site; 64% in internal (enterprise) data centers
Direct water consumptionAbout 66 billion liters2023All U.S. data centers, on site; 84% hyperscale and colocation, 12% internal
Direct water consumption, hyperscale only60 to 124 billion liters2028 (projection)Hyperscale data centers, on site
Indirect water consumptionNearly 800 billion liters2023Water consumed generating the electricity U.S. data centers used, based on regional grid mixes
Average site WUEJust over 0.36 L/kWhThrough 2023Average across all U.S. data centers; projected 0.45 to 0.48 L/kWh after 2023

For scale on the energy side, the same LBNL work found that data centers used about 4.4 percent of total U.S. electricity in 2023 (176 TWh), with projections of about 6.7 to 12 percent by 2028. Indirect water use rises with that electricity demand unless the grid mix changes.

Why do data centers use water?

Data centers use water mainly to reject heat. Every watt of IT power becomes heat, and evaporating water is one of the most energy-efficient ways to move that heat outdoors.

  • Cooling towers. Water-cooled chillers send heat through a condenser water loop to cooling towers, where a portion of the water evaporates and carries the heat away. LBNL found that facilities with water-cooled chillers and no economizers have the highest water usage effectiveness of the systems it modeled, largely because of cooling tower water use.
  • Evaporative and adiabatic cooling. Some air handlers and dry coolers spray or wet media to pre-cool air on hot days. Water is used only when that wet mode runs, but on hot sites that can be often.
  • Humidification. Some sites add moisture to the air at times to stay within humidity limits, which uses a smaller amount of water.
  • Electricity generation. Thermoelectric power plants need cooling, and hydroelectric reservoirs lose water through surface evaporation. That water is consumed off site, on behalf of every kilowatt-hour the data center buys.

The cooling guide explains chillers, towers, and economizers in more detail.

Direct vs. indirect water use

Direct (site) water is what the data center itself consumes, mostly in its cooling system. Indirect (source) water is what power plants consume to make the facility's electricity. LBNL reports both, and notes that including both "reflects the true water cost of data centers," although the indirect part is complex to calculate and depends heavily on the electricity source.

Two definitions matter here. Withdrawal is all the water taken from a river, aquifer, or utility. Consumption is the part of withdrawn water that is permanently removed from the immediate water cycle, usually by evaporation. The LBNL data center figures are consumption figures.

LBNL's national average for indirect water was 4.52 liters per kWh of data center electricity in 2023, compared with 4.35 L/kWh for U.S. electricity overall, reflecting the grid regions where data centers are located. The report also notes that its method does not account for power purchase agreements or on-site generation, which could change the result for individual facilities.

What is WUE (water usage effectiveness)?

Water usage effectiveness (WUE) is a facility's annual water consumption in liters divided by its IT equipment energy in kWh. It is the water counterpart of PUE, and like PUE it should be reported with its scope: site WUE counts only on-site water, while source WUE adds the water used to generate the electricity.

A low site WUE is not automatically better. LBNL points out that water-cooled and evaporative systems are generally more energy efficient than air-cooled chillers and other waterless systems, which use no water on site but more electricity. A site that cuts water by switching to air-cooled equipment can raise its PUE and its indirect water and carbon footprint. The energy efficiency and PUE guide covers PUE, WUE, and CUE together.

Tracking efficiency at your site? Calculate PUE from your facility and IT energy readings.

Open the PUE Calculator

How data center designs reduce water use

Designs reduce water use by rejecting heat without evaporation for more hours of the year, or by using water that does not compete with drinking supplies. Each choice has an energy cost or a climate limit.

Water-saving cooling approaches and their trade-offs
ApproachHow it saves waterTrade-off
Air-cooled chillersReject heat to outdoor air with fans; no cooling tower water.More electricity, especially in hot weather, which raises indirect water use.
Dry coolers (with or without adiabatic assist)Closed coils cooled by air; water is sprayed only on the hottest days if adiabatic assist is fitted.Larger equipment; in hot climates the wet mode can run often.
Airside economizersUse outdoor air for cooling so chilled water systems can shut down in favorable weather. LBNL notes this is common at hyperscale sites, with only sporadic adiabatic cooling.Depends on climate and air quality; needs careful humidity and filtration control.
Closed-loop liquid coolingCoolant runs in a closed loop to the chips, and warmer water temperatures allow more economizer hours or dry coolers.Saves water only if the facility's heat rejection is waterless or mostly so; heat sent to cooling towers is still evaporated.
Reclaimed or non-potable waterSupplies cooling towers with treated wastewater or other non-drinking water.Does not reduce consumption; needs suitable supply, treatment, and permits.

Operations matter too. Good cooling tower water treatment lets towers run more cycles before blowdown, leak detection catches losses early, and raising supply temperatures within the ASHRAE recommended range (18-27 °C, or 64.4-80.6 °F, for most equipment) increases economizer hours. Mechanical Systems & Equipment Maintenance covers water treatment and chiller operation, and Cooling Systems Design & Optimization covers economizers, containment, and liquid cooling.

Do golf courses use more water than data centers?

On U.S. national totals, golf's figure is larger. U.S. golf facilities applied a projected 1.63 million acre-feet of water in 2024, about 2 trillion liters, according to the Golf Course Superintendents Association of America (GCSAA). U.S. data centers directly consumed about 66 billion liters in 2023 and indirectly consumed nearly 800 billion liters through electricity, according to LBNL.

Data center vs. golf course water figures, side by side
U.S. data centersU.S. golf facilities
Headline figureAbout 66 billion liters direct (about 17 billion gallons); nearly 800 billion liters indirect (about 211 billion gallons)Projected 1.63 million acre-feet (about 531 billion gallons, or about 2 trillion liters)
Year20232024
What is countedWater consumed: on site (direct) and at power plants (indirect)Water applied to the facility, mostly irrigation
How it was estimatedModel of the U.S. data center stock, cooling systems, and grid water intensitySurvey of nearly 1,700 golf facilities, projected to all U.S. facilities
Water sourcesVaries by site; not broken out nationallyWells 32%, lakes and ponds 27%, recycled water 19%
TrendDirect use about three times the 2014 level; projected to keep rising31% less than in 2005
PublisherLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory for the U.S. DOE, December 2024GCSAA, survey funded in part by the USGA, released December 2025

Taken at face value, golf's applied water is roughly 30 times data centers' direct consumption and a little over twice direct and indirect combined. Gallon and liter conversions are ours, using 325,851 gallons per acre-foot (the GCSAA's figure) and 3.785 liters per gallon.

Why the golf course comparison is apples to oranges

The golf course vs. data center comparison is popular because both are visible, local land uses that draw water. But the two national figures differ in what they count, so neither side of the debate should lean on them too hard.

  1. Consumption vs. application. LBNL counts water consumed, meaning removed from the immediate water cycle. The GCSAA counts water applied to turf and grounds. Its survey does not report how much of that water evaporates or is taken up by plants versus how much returns to the ground.
  2. Direct vs. indirect. The data center figure can include power plant water; the golf figure includes none of the indirect water behind irrigation pumps or course maintenance. Comparing data centers' direct plus indirect water with golf's direct water alone is not like for like either.
  3. National vs. local. Water stress is local. One large campus drawing on a stressed municipal system can matter more to a town than any national total, and the same is true of a course in a dry basin. In the GCSAA's 2020 survey, the Southeast and Southwest regions accounted for 58 percent of golf's applied water.
  4. Different sources and quality. The GCSAA lists recycled water as 19 percent of golf's irrigation water sources in 2024. Data centers draw on municipal, reclaimed, and groundwater supplies depending on the site. A liter of treated drinking water and a liter of reclaimed wastewater are not equal in value to a community.
  5. Different years, methods, and directions. The figures are a year apart, one is a model and the other a survey, and they are moving in opposite directions: golf's applied water fell 31 percent from 2005 to 2024, while data center direct consumption roughly tripled from 2014 to 2023.

What the evidence supports: nationally, golf irrigation is the larger water user by these published measures, and data center water use is smaller but growing quickly and concentrated in specific places. Whether any given project is a good use of local water is a local question that needs local data: the site's cooling design, its WUE, its water source, and the condition of the watershed.

Courses on cooling, efficiency, and environmental compliance

These self-paced courses cover the cooling, efficiency, maintenance, and permitting decisions that drive a facility's water use. Each awards a certificate of completion.

Cooling Systems Design & Optimization

Cooling & Efficiency·Comprehensive Program·PUE / ASHRAE Thermal Guidelines

Cut cooling costs and improve reliability with modern thermal management strategy.

8 hrs
$298.99

Energy Efficiency & PUE Optimization

Cooling & Efficiency·Modular Specialization·PUE

Cut operating costs with a measurable PUE optimization roadmap.

Mechanical Systems & Equipment Maintenance

Cooling & Efficiency·Modular Specialization

Hands-on mechanical maintenance — piping, chillers, and vibration diagnostics.

Facility Environmental Compliance

Security & Compliance·Modular Specialization

Understand the environmental regulations that apply to your facility.

Save 42% with the bundle

Cooling & Facilities Efficiency Bundle

6 courses · 24 hours · $462.99 per seat, instead of $798.94 bought separately

Facility managers responsible for permits and reporting should also see Facility Environmental Compliance, and teams tracking efficiency targets should see Energy Efficiency & PUE Optimization.

Frequently asked questions

Do golf courses use more water than data centers?

On U.S. national totals, yes. Golf facilities applied a projected 1.63 million acre-feet of water in 2024, about 2 trillion liters, according to the GCSAA. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimates that data centers directly consumed about 66 billion liters in 2023, plus nearly 800 billion liters indirectly through electricity. The figures measure different things, so the comparison says little about local water impact.

How much water does a data center use per day?

It depends on size, climate, and cooling design, so no single number is accurate. You can estimate on-site use by multiplying daily IT energy by the site's water usage effectiveness (WUE). For example, a facility with 10 MW of IT load uses 240,000 kWh a day; at the 2023 U.S. average site WUE of about 0.36 liters per kWh, that is roughly 86,000 liters a day. Evaporatively cooled sites can use much more, and air-cooled sites far less.

What is the difference between water withdrawal and water consumption?

Withdrawal is all the water taken from a source. Consumption is the part that is not returned to the immediate water cycle, mostly because it evaporates. In a cooling tower, the water that evaporates is consumed, while blowdown is discharged and can be treated and reused downstream.

Does liquid cooling use more or less water?

The liquid loop to the chips is closed and does not consume water by itself. Total water use depends on how the facility rejects the heat. Liquid cooling allows warmer water temperatures, which can extend economizer hours and allow dry coolers, but if the heat ends up in evaporative cooling towers, the site still consumes water.

Is data center water usage increasing?

Yes. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimates U.S. data center direct water consumption rose from 21.2 billion liters in 2014 to about 66 billion liters in 2023, and projects that hyperscale data centers alone could consume 60 to 124 billion liters in 2028. Indirect water use also grows with electricity demand.

Sources

This guide is general educational information, not engineering, environmental, or legal advice. Figures are national estimates with the years and scopes stated; check local utility, permit, and watershed data for any specific site.

Train Your Team on Efficient Cooling

Our Cooling & Facilities Efficiency courses cover cooling design, PUE optimization, chillers, water treatment, and the maintenance that keeps them efficient.